Debunking a Biblical Lie

Is a little knowledge always a dangerous thing?

Probably not. But if I actually think the texts of the Bible are fluid documents—that is, rehashed, redrafted versions of the original languages, then I’m only fooling myself.

The history I present here is meant to encourage Jesus Christ’s disciple to seek a fuller understanding of God’s written word by acquiring the skills to help him do just that. But truth isn’t a gift that just falls out of the sky. Learning to pursue it is a skill that has to be developed like anything else.

If it’s not, even the most faithful disciple can be easily deceived.

One of the most flagrant lies about the reliability of Bible texts is one that seems innocent enough to be believable. While often cited from a pagan perspective, the idea that what was originally recorded in the Scriptures has somehow been “lost in the translations” over the millennia is also endorsed in some circles of the Christian community—including at least one [formerly] well-respected textual critic!

This logic appeals to an element of common sense in all of us. The first guy copies the original, and the second guy copies that copy…and so on and so forth over a period of four thousand years. So, if I inject human error into the equation, it’s natural to assume that much of what was first written has morphed into something quite different today.

But there’s one big problem with this theory.

Even though no original Greek manuscripts of the New Testament letters and narratives [for example] are known to exist, our translations today are carefully refined periodically and rendered out of a multitude of existing ancient manuscripts-some which are very old, having been discovered in the past two-hundred years and are estimated to have been written as early as the second or third century, A.D.

There’s also another snag.

When someone argues that the Bible cannot be without error because there are several hundred thousand textual variants [or differences] among all the existing manuscripts, he’ll often forget to mention [or be wholly unaware] that nearly all of these discrepancies are typos, misspelled words and accent variations.

But as one who regularly translates the Nestle-Aland 28th Edition of the Greek New Testament and notes most differences listed in the textual apparatus, I can assure you that virtually none of these variants affect the intended meanings of the authors. What few inconsistencies exist are often the result of translational bias instead.

The same could be said about the many translations in use today. Some are more literal than others, but, for the most part, they all say the same thing.

The bottom line is that, with scholars and textual critics having over 5000 of these ancient manuscripts [and many more corroborating fragments of them] at their disposal, the Scriptures are obviously the most documented collation of literature in history!

While all these documents may not match in form, they validate one another in bringing across the meaning and purpose of God’s written word.

He has made it happen!

A Series of Fortunate Events

What I’m not aware of sometimes comes back to bite me.

But I’ve also learned that unintended consequences don’t always have to be bad. They can even be a blessing.

In the apostle Paul’s first letter to the church of God which [was] at Corinth, he unveiled a remarkable outcome of being set apart to God for those bound by the marriage covenant.

For the unbelieving husband has been sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified through her believing husband, for otherwise your children are unclean, but now they are holy… For how do you know, O wife, whether you shall save your husband? Or how do you know, O husband, whether you shall save your wife?” [1Cor. 7:14,16] [my emphasis]

[σῴζω: (sō’-zō) to save in regard to Christian salvation; save, rescue, deliver, keep safe, preserve, cure, make well]

[ἁγιάζω: (hâ-gee-âh’-zō) to set apart as sacred to God; make holy or sanctify, consecrate; regard as sacred; purify, cleanse]

It’s interesting that Paul indicated these sentences to be his opinion as opposed to being a revelation from Christ, something he noted in the previous sentence. But that shouldn’t discount the weight of his words. He seems to be suggesting that a bond of mutual purity is just one of the many things the marriage covenant is intended to establish, and that honoring that commitment is, in fact, one avenue to sanctification in itself.

So, do I have the means to actually keep my wife clean? Not necessarily. But I can keep my marriage intact simply by guarding it. And by doing that, I’m preserving her purity and my children’s as well. That’s regarding them as sacred [see: ἁγιάζω above].

However, I’ve learned that becoming holy isn’t a spectator sport. The Spirit sets me apart as I also set myself and my family apart.

It’s a partnership.

To fully grasp how I, as a believing husband, should be able to accomplish this purification process in the sight of God, I must understand the relational paradigm of the family—and particularly how a husband and wife should model themselves after Christ and His church. [see: Eph. 5:25-27; 1Cor. 11:3, 7]

[How can I be like Christ in my marriage? see: A Recipe for Confusion]

Being a Godly father and husband is a tough job. The foundations of our families must be laid, built upon and guarded by holy [see: ἁγιάζω above] husbands in order to keep their families clean, thereby saving them [see σῴζω above] from contamination by the world.

Fathers, don’t let the world diminish your role as a sanctifier!

Free Will and the Deliberate Man

God is certainly capable of causing anything He chooses to happen.

But if I believe my decisions don’t really matter because He has somehow predetermined how I’ll make them, then why would He demand my love and obedience at the same time?

What would be the point?

If the sequence of my entire life has already been programmed in advance, there’d be no need for me to develop any type of calculative process for making decisions or judgements. And without this competence to express emotional or intellectual preferences, I’d have neither the inclination nor the ability to love the One who created me for that very purpose!

Here’s something else to consider.

God created every man [and woman] in His own image. [Gen. 1:27] This means that, simply by virtue of having been born, I was made to reflect His Divine image. That image wasn’t earned or developed, like muscles and character are. It’s my purpose for being alive. And, since I’m a descendant of the first man, Adam, I’m also an imager of God. So, I also have been given a mandate to rule and subdue the Earth. [Gen. 1:28]

How, then, can I accomplish such a thing without making free will decisions?

I can’t.

Because to be obedient is to make choices. And the God who created me for the purpose of seeking fellowship with Him and others is well aware that love cannot sustain itself in a relational vacuum. Emotional awareness is what recognizes the potential of any relationship, and intentional love is what we demonstrate to confirm the real value of it.

A man’s will is the only mechanism by which he can choose to love anything.

How can God intervene in such a crucial process?

The Prerogative of Jealousy

Jesus made it very clear that He wouldn’t play second fiddle to anyone.

“If anyone comes to Me, and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters—yes, and even his own life, he cannot be My disciple. Whoever does not carry his own cross and come after Me cannot be My disciple.” [Lk. 14:26-27] [my emphasis]

[μισέω: hate, despise; disregard, be indifferent to]

On the other hand, He never suggested that any of His disciples arbitrarily loath their family members either. He did, rather, use hyperbole often enough to make His point. And this time, it was simply about prioritizing relationships.

But I think it’s not enough just to honor the commandments of a jealous God [Ex. 34:14, Deut. 4:24, 5:9, 6:15]. I also believe it’s important to understand why it’s necessary for Him to be that way.

The New Oxford American Dictionary defines jealous as an adjective used to describe emotions which are “fiercely protective or vigilant of one’s rights or possessions.” The line between jealousy and covetousness is very visible here when we understand the latter as an unjustified or lawless desire.

So, even though both of these emotions emerge from a desire to satisfy a passion to either possess or connect with something or someone, jealously is the only defensible sentiment of the two, because it’s a legitimate response to protect rightful ownership.

And make no mistake, God is the rightful owner of the flock He purchases with His own Son’s blood. [Ac. 20:28; Rev. 5:9-10] But, remember, no man can be purchased against his will. Jesus said, “If anyone comes to me…” Why would He be “fiercely protective” of something He doesn’t own?

He owns me because I chose to love Him. And it seems to me that one way He reciprocates His love for me [His possession] is by being jealous if I don’t love Him more than life itself.

So, am I justified drawing the same jealous lines in the sand like Jesus did?

Only if I know how to love what’s rightfully mine.

The Last Hill Left to Die On

Wake up, gentlemen.

It won’t be long before it starts surging over the top of the dam. When that happens, you won’t be able to just shut your door and ignore it any more. It’ll quickly invade every part of your home—and your life.

But it’s not like you didn’t see it coming.

You were just hoping it’d go away or that maybe somebody else might come up with a plan to ward off the septic mixture of corruption, immorality, perversion and lawlessness that’ll soon be flowing rampantly in the streets.

It’s too bad you didn’t have the guts to put your foot down, though.

Remember?

When your public school system began testing the waters to see who would object to teaching about and encouraging homosexual behavior among your children, you said, “Well…I’m not so sure we should be doing this.”

And when the school boards decided to appropriate tax dollars to fund programs to enlighten your children and the community to the notion that boys could become girls and girls could become boys if they so desired, you said, “Well, that’s ridiculous…”

But you didn’t say no.

In fact, most fathers couldn’t even to find the time to show up at the school district’s board meetings to express any anger over what was happening. But there were plenty of mothers present whose pleas were arrogantly dismissed.

You didn’t even have sense enough to watch out for yourself.

Because when your state’s regulators and legislative body realized they could siphon off more revenue by legalizing illegal marijuana for recreational use, you said, “Aah…no big deal, I used to smoke some pot.”

You chose to ignore the data that verifies the harmful physical and mental effects of marijuana over time—but more importantly, how the noxious consequences of legalization has eroded the moral fabric of our communities.

Maybe you aren’t actually a pothead, but you’ve been thinking like one.

Because you couldn’t find a reason to be outraged about “health-care professionals” murdering unborn children either. Nor did you and any other male guardians dare come together with a loud voice to insist that your elected officials enforce the unalterable civil statutes which were designed by God to protect them.

Your subtle acceptance of the social malignancy of cohabitation speaks volumes about how little you respect the sacred institution of marriage that God created for us. You caved in to the popular opinion that financial security and actual obedience to Christ’s commands are hardly compatible. You accepted the convenient lie that a legally binding covenant between a man and a woman is merely a formality that isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.

Remember the credible evidence of electoral corruption and ignorance demonstrated at every level of governance a couple of years ago? Your response was pathetic: “Hey, wait a minute…I don’t think they should be able to get a way with that…”

As one of God’s authorized image-bearers who was created to both rule and subdue the Earth, why haven’t you, along with other courageous fathers, demanded [and verified] that integrity be restored to your county’s election process—and everything else, for that matter?

Is it because someone has convinced you that showing a little more love and tolerance in the face of evil will transform you into a more realistic image of Jesus—one your family and the world will like a lot more?

Way to go.

Your children and grandchildren are watching you very closely. And, just in case you were too stoned to notice, they’re establishing moral parameters for making sound decisions based on those observations—just like you did.

When did you abandon the ones you’d once established?

Don’t get me wrong, you’re all for goodness, propriety and justice. The problem is, you refuse to allow any testosterone remaining in your body to eliminate the chronic idleness which enslaves you.

You vacillate between apathy and cowardice. You stay at home with the kids while your wife and a few of her friends take the time to go scold the reprobates sitting on the local school board, or representing you in the state legislature, or to confront any other moral atrocity threatening your community.

It’s time to man up and start throwing sandbags on the dam. If you don’t, you’re not gonna have a chance to prevail over the things you’ve seen coming—let alone destroy them.

Because, once they get over the top, they’re just more water under the bridge.

“The way of a fool is right in his own eyes, but a wise man is he who listens to counsel.” [Prov. 12:15]

Achieving Kingdom Clarity

I appeal to every brother in Christ Jesus.

Unless I first understand and then develop a model of God’s kingdom in my life as His disciple, I can be sure of two things: 1] I’ll be satisfied believing things about the Bible which are simply not true, and 2] the focus of any hope I might have to live again with Him will be seriously misguided.

The very first words spoken by Jesus after He was tempted in the wilderness for forty days as recorded by Matthew and Mark seemed to amplify the immediacy of God’s plan for the ages:

“From that time [on], Jesus began to preach and say, ‘Repent, for the kingdom of the heavens has come near’ [Matt. 4:17]

“Now after John had been taken into custody, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of God, and saying, ‘The time has been fulfilled, and the kingdom of God has come near. Repent and believe in the good news.’” [Mk. 1:14-15]

[What does it actually mean to repent? see: Climbing the Ladder of Repentance]

The intended audience of Matthew’s gospel account was largely Jewish. Hence, the phrase “kingdom of the heavens” was recorded instead of “kingdom of God” so as not to offend some of the devout factions of Jews who considered His name so holy that it could not be spoken or written.

However, the desire not to offend has always had a cost. The term “the kingdom of the heavens,” has probably been more misleading than anything over the centuries. For neither Jesus Christ nor any Biblical author ever suggested that resurrected life would exist anywhere outside of God’s kingdom.

The heavens, on the other hand, is a term that defines the unlimited expanse of space in God’s universe and what’s in it. Not only that, the word “Heaven” translated as a proper noun in the Bible is actually recorded in plural form in most instances with an article [i.e., the heavens] in both original languages.

[Greek: οὐρανός: (your-â-nôs) sky, air, firmament; any area above the earth; heaven(s); the place of sun, moon, and stars; heaven in which God dwells.]

[Hebrew: שָׁמַיִם (sha-may-im) from an unused word; heaven, sky]

So Biblical literacy understands “Heaven” or “the heavens” as what exists above us and is somehow able to conceal from us an unseen realm before which the Lord God is currently revealing His purposes. [Eph. 3:10]

His kingdom, though, exists now in a form that is presently being augmented [Lk. 17:21] and will soon be fully inaugurated in glory on the earth [Dan. 12:2; 7:13-14; Rev. 11:15] when Christ Himself returns [1Thes. 4:13-18] to raise the righteous dead! [Ac. 24:14-15; 1Cor. 15:22-23]

I urge Jesus Christ’s disciples to hold teachers and pastors accountable to Biblical accuracy.

[How can I tell what Biblical accuracy is? see: Sharing in the Divine Nature]

His good news calls upon all of us to repent in order to enter into and be partakers of the riches of His inheritance in God’s kingdom [Eph. 1:17-19; Matt. 25:31-34].

[So what’s “inheritance” all about? see: Birthright Through Redemption]

There’s no offer to secure a free ticket to a place called heaven.

His Flesh and Mine

The physical requirements of human life demand that we nurture and sustain our flesh even though the apostle Paul wrote that flesh and blood are not able to inherit the kingdom of God. [1Cor. 15:50]

But nothing in the Bible suggests that the condition of human flesh is irrelevant to being a disciple of Jesus Christ.

Even so, many of His congregations today accept a false doctrine of dualism, embracing an ancient pagan Greek concept that the intangible part of a living being is immortal. The presumption then, is that this unseen part of a man is the only part of him that matters when it comes to things like salvation.

[Can salvation mean different things in the Bible? see: Playing to Win the Salvation Game]

While dualism is problematic with much of the Scriptures, this de-valuation of the human body also breeds a sense of apathy. It not only neutralizes the significance of Christ’s future raising of the dead, but it also ignores the power of the flesh, leaving no reason to do anything about it:

“…the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness [and] self-control. Against such [things] there is no law. And those who are of Christ Jesus [have] crucified the flesh with the passions and the desires. If we live by the Spirit, let us also follow the Spirit.” [Gal.5:22-25, the apostle Paul’s letter to the churches of Galatia]

The fact is, I can’t be a disciple of Jesus Christ without my flesh, so I need to deal with it.

At His crucifixion, He cancelled the certificate of debt created by my flesh and “nailed” it to the cross. [Col. 2:13-14] But even though the debt has been paid, the problem hasn’t been eliminated.

The power of the flesh is substantial. It will indeed overcome me if I don’t nail it to the cross right next to His certificate of paid debt.

But if I’ve been convinced that my flesh doesn’t matter, then why would I care?

Are You Foolish Enough?

Have you ever thought about what it really means to be a fool for Christ?

Any such claim is sure to provoke an endless response of pagan humor. Yet, many men who profess Him never become foolish enough for anybody to notice.

In his letter to the church of God which [was] at Corinth, the apostle Paul seems to contrast his identity with that of the readers:

“…I think, God has exhibited us apostles last of all, as men condemned to death, because we have become a spectacle to the world, both to angels and to men. We are fools for Christ’s sake, but you are prudent in Christ. We are weak, but you are strong. You are distinguished, but we are without honor.” [1Cor. 4:9-10] [my emphasis]

So, what made him different from them?

I wonder if the Corinthian congregations were hungry, thirsty and poorly clothed all the time? Were they treated roughly, not having had a decent place to sleep? Did they bless those who abused them and patiently endure persecution? [see: vss. 4:11-13]

Indeed, some faithful disciples of Christ in the world today have to endure these things. But most in His flock do not—not yet, anyway. Even so, the world despises and ridicules a fool. It’s full of people who do all kinds of stupid things for stupid reasons. But pagans make no distinctions about the reasons for foolish conduct.

There are, though, at least two types of people who do: 1]others in the Body of Christ, and 2]those whom God has given the capacity to actually notice a distinction. Both types recognize that Jesus Christ’s fool will always take the heat for walking on His narrow path of obedience and will always defend His moral high ground at any cost.

And they rarely ever second guess themselves.

That’s why Paul chose to be foolish in the eyes of the world. And, as a father who was speaking to his children, he didn’t suggest they follow suit—he insisted on it:

“Therefore I exhort you, become imitators of me.” [1Cor. 4:16] [my emphasis]

My transformed life as an ambassador for Jesus Christ doesn’t exist to expand or intensify the lusts of my flesh in this age. Nor is my pattern of behavior limited to the eyes in this domain of the human experience. It’s also witnessed by the eyes in an unseen realm. [see: Eph. 3:8-11]

It happened to make Him look good. Not me.

So, I’ll never be foolish enough to be a fool for anyone other than Him.

“Have the courage to have your wisdom regarded as stupidity. Be fools for Christ. And have the courage to suffer the contempt of the sophisticated world.” –Antonin Scalia


The Confident Conscience

I used to convince myself that I was constantly seeking the will of God.

But it was actually just a hit and miss activity that suited me well as long as what He desired somehow fell in line with what I wanted. And when I’d hit a brick wall, I’d gratefully acknowledge that He was in charge, yet continue to seek what was important to me.

At some point, however, I came to understand that the first step in accomplishing His will was to develop a God-honoring conscience.

So how does that happen?

After all, I actually do want to do God’s will, but my selfish human nature often gets in the way. [Jer. 17:9] The human conscience is extremely vulnerable to manipulation. That must be why the author of the Hebrews Letter encouraged the reader to constantly have his cleansed and renewed:

“…and since we have a great priest over the house of God, let us draw near with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water.” [Heb. 10:21-22]

[συνείδησις: (soo-nā-dā-sîs) conscience, awareness, consciousness]

I would concede that, ultimately, developing a God-honoring conscience is the work of the Holy Spirit. But Jesus Christ’s disciple enhances that process by making confident free will decisions. And confident disciples never consider anything other than what is good and right in the sight of God.

But it’s not just a gut feeling.

They trust that the consequences of those decisions align with the will of God because of their knowledge of His Written Word. They don’t act on their emotions. They know sound Biblical decisions can never be made without actually applying sound Biblical principles to their lives. And they are absolutely convinced that His will is what’s best for them. [Rom. 8:28-30]

Confident disciples clothe themselves in the Word of God so that they won’t be deceived into putting their fleshly lusts above what the Lord Himself has prepared for them:

“The world is passing away, and also its lusts, but the one who does the will of God lives in the age.” [1Jn. 2:17]

[What does it mean to “live in the age?” see: Let’s Engage the Coming Age!]

Confidence is precious. Don’t lose it.

“Therefore, do not throw away your confidence, which has a great reward. For you have need of endurance, so that when you have done the will of God, you might receive what was promised.” [Heb. 10:35-36]

Emerge a Winner!

How positive was the apostle Paul that he’d be raised from the dead?

It seems that no other man could have ever been more positive based on the Biblical testimony of his conversion and his claims of having had more than one personal revelation from the Lord Jesus Christ. 

Why, then, would he have recorded something that seems so uncertain in his letter to the saints in Christ Jesus who [were] in Philippi?

“…[that I might] know Him and the power of His resurrection and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death, if, in some way, I shall attain to the resurrection from among the dead.”  [Phil. 3:10-11]  [my emphasis]

“If, in some way?”  Seriously?

Think about that.  If Paul believed the coming resurrection of the righteous dead wouldn’t include everyone who belongs to Christ, that would contradict what he wrote in his letter to the church in Corinth: 

“For as in Adam all die, so also, in Christ, all shall be made alive.” [1Cor. 15:22]  [my emphasis]

Perhaps the key to understanding his attitude can be found a couple of sentences later:

“I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.”  [Phil. 3:14]  [my emphasis]

In context, the “upward call” would literally define the voice of Jesus Christ when He calls forth the dead from their tombs.  [see: Jn.5:28-29, 1Cor. 15:51-52, 1Thes. 4:13-18, Rev. 20:1-6]  And the Greek expression “εἴ πως” (ā-pōs) [in Phil. 3:11 above], meaning “if somehow,” or “if, in some way” has to be taken at face value.  The grammar here doesn’t allow for a loose interpretation.  

Consider then that being raised from the dead wasn’t the goal Paul was seeking at all.  That was a certainty, given that he belonged to Christ. [Eph. 1:7-8, 13; 2Cor. 4:13-14]  He wasn’t pressing on for the upward call itself, but rather for God’s prize of that upward call . 

But what exactly was it?  

The grammar in Phil. 3:11 implies that the resurrection will  function on two levels.  The Greek word “ἀνάστασις” [âh-nâ’-stâh-sîs: resurrection] is recorded forty-two times in the New Testament, but only once here in the Accusative Case using the prepositional prefix “ἐξ,” [êks], meaning “out of:”  ἐξανάστασιν.  This suggests that, not only will the dead rise from the dead, but then some will also emerge out of that group to claim a winner’s prize.

Imagine that.  Unlike kid’s soccer today, the winners take the prize!

Remember, everyone who belongs to Christ has already been brought into fellowship with Him on an equal footing. [Gal. 3:26-29]  However, striving not to be disqualified from a race by running to win it rather than to merely finish it was an important concept in Paul’s mind:

“I do all things for the sake of the gospel, so that I may become a fellow partaker of it.  Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but only one receives the prize?  Run in such a way that you may win…but I discipline my body and make it my slave, so that, after I have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified.”  [[1Cor. 9:23-24, 27]  [my emphasis]

Not only that, in his second letter to Timothy, Paul seems to reveal more fully the extent of winning the prize in the race.  It appears that I will live with Christ [be resurrected] if I have died [to sin] with Him.  But there’s a condition to reigning with Him:

“…if anyone competes as an athlete, he does not win the prize unless he competes according to the rules….for this reason I endure all things for the sake of those who are chosen, so that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus and with it eternal glory. 

It is a trustworthy statement:  

For if we died with Him, we will also live with Him.

If we endure, we will also reign with Him.  

If we deny Him, He also will deny us.  

If we are faithless, He remains faithful, for He cannot deny Himself.”  [2Tim. 2:5,10-13]  [my emphasis]

The idea that obedience and hard work will be rewarded proportionally at the coming resurrection of the righteous dead at the end of this age can hardly be disputed.  [see: Dan. 12:2; Matt. 22:1-14]  Some of God’s people will be raised to experience an abundant life—others, shame.  

And indeed, some of them will shine like the brightness of the expanse.

“Therefore, as many as are mature, let us have this attitude.”  [the apostle Paul, Phil. 3:15]