I think we need to wake up and start reading the Bible.
Because, over the centuries, both ecclesiastical and pagan traditions have somehow re-built the created man into a loosely connected conglomeration of flesh and imperishable conscious thought.
That’s not to say that we don’t exist both physically and nonphysically. That’d be absurd, because either of these conditions are necessarily dependent upon the other to sustain human life. But, as disciples of Jesus Christ, we’re only deceiving ourselves if we choose to categorize the human makeup into distinct, autonomous entities.
Why?
Because the Biblical authors clearly illustrated the inseparable composition of humanity. For example, note that the apostle Paul, in his letter to all who [were] beloved of God in Rome, called as saints, he recorded the word “he” as a Greek Masculine Pronoun in this well-known revealing passage:
“For if we have become united with Him in the likeness of His death, certainly we shall also be in the likeness of His resurrection, knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him, in order that our body of sin might be done away with, so that we would no longer be slaves to sin, for he who has died is freed from sin.” [Rom. 6:5-7] [my emphasis]
Notice also that the apostle Peter viewed human souls in the same light, recording a parallel passage using the same Masculine Gender:
“Therefore, since Christ has suffered In the flesh, arm yourselves also with the same purpose, because he who has suffered in the flesh has ceased from sin, so as to live the rest of the time in the flesh no longer for the lusts of men, but for the will of God.” [1Pet. 4:1-2] [my emphasis]
Did you notice that there’s nothing in these texts copied above to suggest that only a “sinful part” of the regenerate man has died to sin? If either Paul or Peter were referring to some part of a man, they would’ve used a Neuter Pronoun to modify a thing rather than a person.
But they didn’t.
Human life was perceived and defined by the Biblical authors as an embodiment of the whole person. So, if I understand myself to be a divisible combination of “body” and “soul,” I have a theological dilemma.
Because if I indeed possess something immaterial which I choose to call a “soul” that cannot die [either figuratively or literally], then I have something inside of me that doesn’t need to be freed from sin according to Paul. As a consequence, then, I’d have to conclude that this immaterial, immortal “soul” within me [which would include my thoughts and emotions] is therefore sinless and must remain that way because it cannot die.
After all, what would it need to be freed from?
[So, do I actually “possess” a soul? see: Everybody’s got one?]
But the conundrum wouldn’t stop there.
I’d also have to conclude that the death of my Lord Jesus was merely for the sins in my body and not for my whole self, since my body is the only part of me in which sin is demonstrated.
But perhaps the most obvious question would be the most unsettling:
Why would my resurrection even be necessary if the immortal part of me doesn’t need Jesus Christ’s death to save me since it will never die?
No part of me is off limits to God’s perpetual saving grace through Christ’s redemptive work on the cross, because nothing in the texts of the Bible suggests that sin does not invade everything that I am.
I exist only as the sum of my parts, and He died for all of me.
Posted: June 12, 2022 by cjournalme Leave a Comment
The Land and the Promise
The promise of inheriting land in the coming age is what makes the Good News good.
If I’m not aware of that, I’ve missed something that was important to the Biblical authors. And even though the potential to own land has declined over the centuries, it’s still an inherent ambition of most men even today.
[Is inheriting a Biblical concept? see: Birthright Through Redemption]
In fact, many passages of Scripture define inherited land ownership as a noble objective. But the 37th Psalm helps to connect this precious Jewish hope with the assurance that those who belong to Christ today shall also co-inherit the Lord God’s land and other blessings on an equal footing with His firstborn people Israel: [confirm this by reading: Gal. 3:26-29; Eph. 3:6; Rom. 8:16-17]
“…but those who wait for the LORD, they will inherit the land.” [vs. 9b]
“But the humble will inherit the land and will delight themselves in abundant prosperity.” [vs.11]
“The LORD knows the days of the blameless, and their inheritance will be forever.” [vs 18]
“…those blessed by Him will inherit the land, but those cursed by Him will be cut off.” [vs 22]
“The righteous will inherit the land and dwell in it forever.” [vs 29]
“Wait for the LORD and keep His way, and He will exalt you to inherit the land.” [vs 34]
Six times the Psalmist David exhorts the reader to strive toward the goal of inheriting real estate—that is, the promised land—something which is as much a part of the future of Christ’s people today as it was to David himself. Remember Peter’s words to the brothers on the day of Pentecost:
“Brethren, I may confidently say to you regarding the patriarch David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day…for it was not David who ascended into heaven…” [Acts 2:29, 34a]
So…he won’t inherit any land before Jesus’ faithful disciples will. But according to Peter, they will indeed inherit:
“…the promise is for you [disciples] and your children and for all who are far off, as many as the Lord our God will call to Himself.” [Acts 2:39]
[Read more about why God’s people will all inherit together! A Better Hope of Perfection]
Certainly everything God intends to share with His people isn’t tangible. But nothing should diminish the value of the things that are.