Defending His Precious Gifts

Praise be the name of Jesus Christ our Lord!

A few days ago, this country’s highest appellate court issued a majority opinion concerning the most heinous of aggregate behaviors this nation has been allowing for decades.  They reiterated the process by which a righteous people protect themselves and their families from pagan decadence. 

As a duly legitimate body, they gave nothing to anyone.  Nor did they take anything away from anyone.  They merely reminded us that the power to govern ourselves continues to lie in unrestrained agency of our respective state legislatures. 

In a civilized, moral society—that is, in something we’re expected to embody and demonstrate, the premise that someone can possess the legitimate agency to kill at will can never be granted in the course of public debate or adjudication.  If it is, then a crucial tendency for any form of decency to prevail is forfeited, and no amount of “Christian” tolerance or understanding can takes its place.”  

Any decision Jesus Christ’s disciple makes not to stand up in the face of evil is an open denial of His authority to accomplish an effective line of resistance through the actions of that disciple.  His lack of confidence in Christ’s power to execute much needed change through His Body undermines His purpose of achieving what the Body is unable to do on its own.

[read the rest of:  Are We a Body of Cowards?]

I refuse to find myself standing before Him someday, pleading my case of indifference to His Holy Nature.  

Life is precious.  We’re called to defend it through prayer and action. 

The Land and the Promise

The promise of inheriting land in the coming age is what makes the Good News good.

If I’m not aware of that, I’ve missed something that was important to the Biblical authors. And even though the potential to own land has declined over the centuries, it’s still an inherent ambition of most men even today.

[Is inheriting a Biblical concept? see: Birthright Through Redemption]

In fact, many passages of Scripture define inherited land ownership as a noble objective. But the 37th Psalm helps to connect this precious Jewish hope with the assurance that those who belong to Christ today shall also co-inherit the Lord God’s land and other blessings on an equal footing with His firstborn people Israel: [confirm this by reading: Gal. 3:26-29; Eph. 3:6; Rom. 8:16-17]

“…but those who wait for the LORD, they will inherit the land.” [vs. 9b]

“But the humble will inherit the land and will delight themselves in abundant prosperity.” [vs.11]

“The LORD knows the days of the blameless, and their inheritance will be forever.” [vs 18]

“…those blessed by Him will inherit the land, but those cursed by Him will be cut off.” [vs 22]

“The righteous will inherit the land and dwell in it forever.” [vs 29]

“Wait for the LORD and keep His way, and He will exalt you to inherit the land.” [vs 34]

Six times the Psalmist David exhorts the reader to strive toward the goal of inheriting real estate—that is, the promised land—something which is as much a part of the future of Christ’s people today as it was to David himself. Remember Peter’s words to the brothers on the day of Pentecost:

“Brethren, I may confidently say to you regarding the patriarch David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day…for it was not David who ascended into heaven…” [Acts 2:29, 34a]

So…he won’t inherit any land before Jesus’ faithful disciples will. But according to Peter, they will indeed inherit:

“…the promise is for you [disciples] and your children and for all who are far off, as many as the Lord our God will call to Himself.” [Acts 2:39]

[Read more about why God’s people will all inherit together! A Better Hope of Perfection]

Certainly everything God intends to share with His people isn’t tangible. But nothing should diminish the value of the things that are.

His Breath is the Hope of Life

Hope isn’t very durable unless it’s based in reality.

So, if I want to be sure that what I hope for is something authentic, I’ve got to do my homework. And if I’m willing to actually read the Bible, I can determine for myself that God’s unique capacity to give life is a process which follows a logical pattern.

In his creation account of the Book of Genesis, the author [probably Moses] records the first man existed as a lifeless form until it was infused with a miraculous substance described as the Lord’s breath:

“Then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul. [Gen.2:7] [נֶפֶשׁ (nê-phêsh) a soul, living being, life, self, person]

In the same manner, I was given a type of animating sustenance through the physiological processes present in my mother’s womb. However, according to Solomon, when I die, this “breath” of life in me will again return to the One who originally gave it to me, rendering me a lifeless form—just like that first man was before life was breathed into him and after he died:

“…then the dust will return to the earth as it was, and the breath will return to God who gave it.” [Eccl. 12:7] [רוּחַ (rū-wôck) breath, wind, spirit]

So, since it’s impossible for consciousness to exist apart from brain activity [see: Eccl. 9:5; Psa. 146:3-4], where can I find the Scriptural evidence that God’s breath will again be breathed into me in the future, making me alive?

The Old Testament might provide some answers.

After all, everything recorded in these Jewish writings and prophecy form the basis of what the New Testament authors referred to as The Good News. For example, the Lord God described to His prophet Ezekiel exactly how He was going to raise His people from the dead in the future:

“…I will put sinews on you, make flesh grow back on you, cover you with skin and put breath in you that you may come alive, and you will know that I am the LORD.” [Ezek. 37:6; read: Ezekiel 37:1-14 for full context]

Do you think that, as partakers of Christ’s New Covenant, these passages are somehow irrelevant to us? Read Eph. 3:1-12 and Gal. 3:26-29 and think again.

[Read why nothing could be more relevant: It’s All About Also.]

If my hope is in anything other than what was promised to God’s people of the Old Testament, it’s not based in reality.

The work of the Man Jesus Christ didn’t establish the breath of life.

It is, however, what makes it available to us again.

The Dumb End of the Tape

It’s a common routine in the building trades.

When more than two hands are needed to obtain a dimension, one man extends the “dumb end” of his tape measure for another to hold, relieving him from most of the calculative accountability.

Now, if I’m helping somebody frame a house, it’s probably not necessary for me to be involved in important decisions. But when it comes to making moral choices, I’d be wise not to find myself on the dumb end of the tape, because that means I’m not really involved in an activity that actually does require my participation.

I speak from experience.

For so many years I struggled to be the one on the smart end of a tape measure, but there weren’t any available for me to pick up and shove into somebody’s face—just a lot of dumb ends being pushed into mine.

I was always looking for a short cut. As a young carpenter, I sought glory with no intention of earning it. I was convinced that, merely because I wanted the respect of my peers, I was entitled to it.

I can’t remember when I realized that learning skills applied to more areas of my life than just my occupation. They’re also something I need to develop as Jesus Christ’s disciple so that I can communicate and demonstrate His character and accomplish His purposes.

And discipline is a crucial skill to develop, regardless of how I come by it.

But how interesting it is that a paradigm for discipline is so often revealed to a man through his occupation. I’ve watched the Lord shape men into exactly what He wants them to be by wiring them to eventually grow weary of holding the dumb end of the tape.

Nothing can be accomplished from there.

Get In the Right Game

The world understands choices from a perspective of being either right or wrong.

So, any of them which are questionable eventually end up somewhere inside the realm of acceptability. It’s a convenient system. When any given part of “wrong” becomes too problematic, it’s simply transferred into the darkest gray area of the “right” category.

As a result, that domain is expanding rapidly, blurring the lines which define sound judgment.

But it’s nothing new under the Sun. Our Creator has always perceived sound judgement as choosing life instead of death rather than right over wrong. The first choice brought death to the choosers. [see: Gen. 3] And ever since then, His offer has remained unchanged. After leading His people out of Egypt, He set life and death before them and let them decide which they wanted:

“See, I have set before you today life and prosperity, and death and adversity; in that I command you today to love the LORD your God, to walk in His ways and to keep His commandments and His statutes and His judgments, SO THAT you may live and multiply, and that the LORD your God may bless you…” [Deut, 30:15] [my emphasis]

Note also that the reasons for choosing life have always been good ones. In the same way today, the Son of Man has set the same offer before His disciples:

“Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it. For the gate is small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it.” [the gospel account of Matt. 7:13-14, Jesus’ words to His disciples.]

[What is Life? see: The Precious Pearl of Life. see also:LIFE IN THE BALANCE: Hearing Its Source]

The Lord Jesus Christ’s crown of life is the prize sought by His faithful disciple. [see: Ja. 1:12, Rev. 2:10b] But this type of life will never be achieved when sought by what this world defines as either right or wrong.

The goalposts keep moving all around.

Taming the Rapture Frenzy

Life’s a lot easier if you plow around the stumps.

But sometimes you gotta get ’em out of the way or nothing else fits together. So, I think it’s time to expose a distortion of Scripture that’s been taught in many of our congregations for well over a century.

The term “rapture” was inserted into Biblical doctrine during the 19th Century to help validate a subversive form of Christian theology known as Dispensationalism. The concept is built around a passage in 1Th. 4:17:

“…we who are alive and remain will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air…” [my emphasis] [ἁρπάζω: (har-pâ-zō) take by force, take away, carry off, catch up]

This event, which the apostle Paul recorded to bring hope and comfort to the saints in Thessalonica, describes the second arrival of Jesus Christ and the future resurrection of the righteous dead He often spoke about. It is, however, unfortunate that most traditional interpretations of this passage are wholly inconsistent with what the text of the Bible actually says–-and on more than one level.

[Read why at: Dead or Alive?…Safe in Christ!]

But perhaps the most important lie to refute about “the rapture” is that Jesus Christ’s disciples will not have to endure the tribulation—something that He assured them they would indeed need to prepare themselves for! [see: Matt. 24:4-51]

Why such a big deal?

That it contradicts the Written Word of God should be enough. Who’s to say why John Darby and his colleagues picked up on this preposterous suggestion that the Lord’s grace is cheap and ran so successfully with it over a hundred years ago? Nevertheless, the costs associated with the good news that the Man Jesus Christ and His disciples gave up their lives for have been continually diluted over the centuries.

[How costly is God’s grace? see: High Rollers in His Grace]

If I choose to believe that, as a disciple of Christ, I have nothing to do but wait for the day Jesus is gonna zap me up onto a cloud, I really don’t know His character nor am I willing to read what the Bible actually says for myself.

Human free will is the facilitator of truth.

Make it work for you!

Let Your Violence Be Holy

Believe it or not, men were created to be forceful.

Not at birthday parties or dance recitals. But everywhere else. If you don’t agree, you might be part of the problem—that is, by the design of soft men who’ve been placed in positions of authority, we’ve created a couple of generations of males who are largely passive in nature.

A passive man isn’t necessarily effeminate. But he is one who’s too afraid to be forceful or violent when it becomes necessary. Yet, through his idleness, he demonstrates why God regards effeminacy every bit as abhorrent as other forms of sexual immorality. [see: 1Cor. 6:9-11] The result is that a community which tolerates this type of behavior only helps to advance the progression of a corresponding passive attitude among its fathers and leaders.

And that’s A Recipe for Confusion.

In the gospel account of Matthew, Jesus suggested that his cousin John [the baptist] was a rugged man, both physically and mentally:

“What did you go out into the wilderness to see? A reed shaken by the wind? …A man dressed in soft clothing? [Matt. 11:7b-8a]

Of course they didn’t.

Because John was the embodiment of male ferocity and tenacity, and Jesus was illustrating that John’s character was a pattern for others who desired to enter into the kingdom of the heavens. It wasn’t a cakewalk. Those who were really serious about doing it often had to fight for it:

From the days of John the Baptist until now, the kingdom of the heavens is forcibly entered, and violent men seize it for themselves.” [Matt. 11:12] [βιαστής: (be-ôs-tāys) violent or eager person, forceful one] [my emphasis]

Soft men have always understood that emasculating a civilization gradually is highly preferable to engaging it with violence. It is, in fact, their only option for ruling over it.

But the Biblically “violent” man will never be misled by the distortions and lies proliferated in our feminized culture. He will boldly reject what is detestable in the eyes of his Master at the risk of being offensive to an ignorant heart.

He’ll seize that only opportunity to enter into what Jesus described as the kingdom of the heavens. [see: Matt. 13:1-52]

Will you?

Priceless $50 Words

Some unusual words are fascinating.

And, occasionally, I’m inclined to dig for a better understanding of one. Seeing photographs or images in real time usually get me going in that direction.

Here’s my latest one: Inosculation. From a botanical perspective, this is a natural occurring phenomenon by which tree roots, trunks or branches become intertwined and actually grow together like in the photo above.

But there’s more to appreciate about inosculation besides being something cool to look at. It’s a process that ultimately produces an unusually strong bond between two living things. That makes it incredibly similar to the way a living man becomes connected to his Living God!

Think about it.

This fusion process originates through occasional contact, and that contact progresses with growth. Botanists tell us that, eventually, the bark from each branch becomes worn away at the points of contact, exposing the cambium below.

The cambium is the sensitive part of woody plants—the only part able to successfully initiate and sustain any kind of modification to the growth or shape of that particular species of plant. It’s interesting also that this marvel of the natural world happens at a rate directly proportional to the amount of time these two exposed surfaces remain in contact with one another.

All this suggests to me that proximity is crucial to any kind of change that could be effective in the created order. But it also demonstrates that the consequences of close association are inevitable. In other words, through repeated contact, I can unwittingly become bound to people or situations which are irrelevant or hostile to my growth as a disciple of Jesus Christ.

Just like us, trees need room to grow, and sometimes that requires creating a strong bond to facilitate that growth. But it rarely happens without some form of disruption or distress.

Trees don’t have emotions, of course, but their insides are just as fragile as ours are. On the other hand, they inherently grow toward the light.

Do you?


“For if we have come to be
grown together in the likeness of his death, certainly, in that of his resurrection also, shall we be.
” [Rom. 6:5] from the J.B. Rotherham Emphasized Bible [my emphasis] [σύμφυτος (sūm-foot-âs) adj., sharing in, united with, at one with]

An Appeal to Moral Constancy

Some of us have seen enough.

There are way too many celebrities and role models today trying to convince us that their Christian faith is worthy of our consideration. That’s not to say many aren’t sincere about what they publicly profess. If someone claims to follow Jesus Christ, I have to take him at his word. Perhaps he does.

But I might need to question the consistency of his conduct.

Because if he announces that, through his role or occupation, he wants to bring glory to God, I can’t ignore his behavior outside of those parameters. After all, this is a statement that could hardly be taken out of context. It’d be disingenous to say that I give glory to God only at certain times or in specific situations.

I either do or I don’t.

For example, if I declare my lifestyle to be one which brings honor to the Lord, yet remain unmarried while continuing to shack up with my girlfriend, I might run into some credibility issues with those who are aware that the practice of fornication is still regarded as abhorrent behavior in the eyes of their Creator.

If my claim to faith in Christ is real, then I’m not my own anymore. I was bought at a price. I should glorify God with my body. [1Cor. 6:19-20] I might even fail to do that on occasion, but I’d never risk the Lord’s gift of life in the next age because of some bad habits I can’t seem to break in this one.

Now I’d rarely take exception to what another man believes. If he wants to worship the moon because he’s convinced it’s made of green cheese, that’s his choice. But if he says He belongs to Christ, his behavior should steadily reflect what both Jesus and the apostolic authors taught in the Bible.

And we who make the same claim in Christ’s service must be willing to refute error, especially to one another. [see: Eph. 5:11; Ja. 5:19-20; Titus 1:7-9; 2Tim. 3:16-4:2; Gal. 6:1]

So, who am I to judge another?

I’m the one who sees the Word of God being dragged through the mud because His soldiers are either too afraid or too lazy to stand up against the world’s new standards of moral conduct. And I’m the one who notices what my children and grandchildren are doing and not doing because of what they’re noticing and what they’re not noticing.

[Is it wrong to “judge?” see: The Second Biggest Lie.]

But, as an ambassador for Jesus Christ too, I’m also one who welcomes a brother to examine my behavior on a regular basis as well. If I’m offending my Master in any way, I need to know about it.

If my life is about bringing glory to God, I’ve got to be consistent doing it.

“Those who continue in sin, rebuke in the presence of all, so that the rest also will be fearful [of sinning].” [1Tim. 5:20]

Why Not Free All of Me?

I think we need to wake up and start reading the Bible.

Because, over the centuries, both ecclesiastical and pagan traditions have somehow re-built the created man into a loosely connected conglomeration of flesh and imperishable conscious thought.

That’s not to say that we don’t exist both physically and nonphysically. That’d be absurd, because either of these conditions are necessarily dependent upon the other to sustain human life. But, as disciples of Jesus Christ, we’re only deceiving ourselves if we choose to categorize the human makeup into distinct, autonomous entities.

Why?

Because the Biblical authors clearly illustrated the inseparable composition of humanity. For example, note that the apostle Paul, in his letter to all who [were] beloved of God in Rome, called as saints, he recorded the word “he” as a Greek Masculine Pronoun in this well-known revealing passage:

“For if we have become united with Him in the likeness of His death, certainly we shall also be in the likeness of His resurrection, knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him, in order that our body of sin might be done away with, so that we would no longer be slaves to sin, for he who has died is freed from sin. [Rom. 6:5-7] [my emphasis]

Notice also that the apostle Peter viewed human souls in the same light, recording a parallel passage using the same Masculine Gender:

“Therefore, since Christ has suffered In the flesh, arm yourselves also with the same purpose, because he who has suffered in the flesh has ceased from sin, so as to live the rest of the time in the flesh no longer for the lusts of men, but for the will of God.” [1Pet. 4:1-2] [my emphasis]

Did you notice that there’s nothing in these texts copied above to suggest that only a “sinful part” of the regenerate man has died to sin? If either Paul or Peter were referring to some part of a man, they would’ve used a Neuter Pronoun to modify a thing rather than a person.

But they didn’t.

Human life was perceived and defined by the Biblical authors as an embodiment of the whole person. So, if I understand myself to be a divisible combination of “body” and “soul,” I have a theological dilemma.

Because if I indeed possess something immaterial which I choose to call a “soul” that cannot die [either figuratively or literally], then I have something inside of me that doesn’t need to be freed from sin according to Paul. As a consequence, then, I’d have to conclude that this immaterial, immortal “soul” within me [which would include my thoughts and emotions] is therefore sinless and must remain that way because it cannot die.

After all, what would it need to be freed from?

[So, do I actually “possess” a soul? see: Everybody’s got one?]

But the conundrum wouldn’t stop there.

I’d also have to conclude that the death of my Lord Jesus was merely for the sins in my body and not for my whole self, since my body is the only part of me in which sin is demonstrated.

But perhaps the most obvious question would be the most unsettling:

Why would my resurrection even be necessary if the immortal part of me doesn’t need Jesus Christ’s death to save me since it will never die?

No part of me is off limits to God’s perpetual saving grace through Christ’s redemptive work on the cross, because nothing in the texts of the Bible suggests that sin does not invade everything that I am.

I exist only as the sum of my parts, and He died for all of me.