Realistic Visions of Paradise
Most of us look forward to some form of paradise.
But it can mean different things to different people. Some opinions are well-defined. Others are vague.
And most squabbles about what or where it is fall short of any realistic consensus, because traditional beliefs rarely sacrifice their sacred cows without a fight. Many of these visions contrived by men have been firmly embedded in teaching institutions and congregations for centuries.
As a result, the real impact of the term “Paradise” on God’s people is seldom experienced since the unchecked human imagination has no boundaries in the absence of Biblical exegesis.
So then, what can the texts of the Bible itself actually tell me?
Literally translated in the Bible, this Greek word παράδεισος [pará-dā-sôs] is defined as “a place of blessedness, from the base meaning of garden.” And nothing in the three instances of its usage in the New Testament suggests this term to indicate anything other than an incomprehensible but glorified existence or environment in the immediate presence of the Creator. [see: Lk.22:43, 2Cor. 12:4, Rev. 2:7]
So, what’s the important thing for me to understand about ‘Paradise?
In Luke’s gospel account of the crucifixion of Jesus, our Lord’s response to the criminal being crucified beside Him was profound on many levels:
“But the other [criminal being crucified with Jesus] answered, and rebuking him said, ‘Do you not even fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? And we indeed are suffering justly, for we are receiving what we deserve for our deeds. But this man has done nothing wrong.’ And he was saying, ‘Jesus, remember me when You might come in Your kingdom!’ And He [Jesus] said to him, “Truly I say to you today, you shall [future tense] be with Me in Paradise.” [Lk. 23:40-43]
As an inductive reader, it’s critical for me to consider the context of the criminal’s question to Jesus in the preceding sentence. He was painfully aware that both he and this guy they called “King of the Jews” were on the brink of death, yet he made no petition for his “spirit” to be able to accompany that of our Lord’s on any journey into disembodied bliss.
There was, however, a plea to be remembered at the appropriate time, that is, whenever Jesus “might come into His kingdom.” The Greek grammar and the context of the conversation clearly indicate that both he and Jesus perceived His kingdom as something to transpire in the future.
The text reveals nothing about the two criminals regarding their knowledge of the Jews, the Scriptures or its prophesy. It only records one repentant man’s desperate appeal to share in something he could only hope for.
Paradise is surely the sum of unimaginable splendor soon be revealed in all fullness upon Jesus Christ’s return to the Earth, where God, the Father shall ultimately bring together all creation under His direct authority for the purpose of amplifying His glory and Divine objectives. [see: 1Cor. 15]
But perhaps the real significance of Paradise lies more in how it was used rather than its definition.
The Bible only records Jesus promising it to one person.
What kind of person was he?

Posted: October 27, 2017 by cjournalme Leave a Comment
The Art of Becoming
It’s finally arrived.
That long-awaited aura of “getevenwithemism” is gaining ground in the American culture today.
We’re quickly regressing to what many of us remember to be a more comfortable era when we didn’t have to walk on eggshells in the course of normal conversation for fear or offending someone with our choice of words or expressing our personal opinions based on core values.
And the change is welcomed. Just ask anybody and they’ll tell you:
“Everybody’s gettin’ too sensitive about stuff.”
I agree. This push to reshape the easily offended mindset of the day is legitimate for the most part because the outrage usually amounts to nothing more than whining and is grounded in ulterior motives.
But to what degree does the faithful disciple of Jesus Christ set his brother straight yet continue to defend his own personal habits under the auspice of his freedom in our Lord?
How easily could this pendulum of sound reasoning cut too wide a path swinging in the other direction, crushing a fragile Christian conscience in the process? After all, we’ve all been vulnerable to unnecessary correction at one time or another. And the reasons were varied and complex.
In his letter to the church of God which [was] at Corinth, to those who [had] been sanctified in Christ Jesus, saints by calling, with all who in every place [called] on the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, their Lord and ours…, the apostle Paul warned the reader:
“But take care that this liberty of yours does not somehow become a stumbling block to the weak…for through your knowledge he who is weak is ruined, the brother for whose sake Christ died. And so, by sinning against the brethren and wounding their conscience when it is weak, you sin against Christ. [1Cor. 8:9, 8:11-12] [my emphasis]
It seems that the word to remember here is “somehow.” There’s no process set in stone. Nor are there any pocket-sized flowcharts or smart phone apps to help determine when to bring the hammer down and when to let it slide.
So, here’s another thought—not mine, of course:
“For though I am free from all men, I have made myself a slave to all, so that I might win more…to the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak; I have become all things to all men, so that I might by all means save some. I do all things for the sake of the gospel, so that I might become a fellow partaker of it. [1Cor. 9:19, 9:22-23] [my emphasis]
Far from being vague in his technique, Paul demonstrated the very essence of what our Lord did for all men and women by being born a man and living on the Earth.
He didn’t act like he was all things to all men. He became those things.
That’s what partakers do.
“Give no offense either to Jews or to Greeks or to the church of God, just as I also please all men in all things, not seeking my own profit but the profit of the many, so that they may be saved.” [1Cor. 10:32-33]