Reviving the Savior Narrative

Little boys learn from what they see and what they don’t see.

And I’m afraid they’re not seeing some things they need to, that is—fathers being saviors.

It is indeed true that governments have been instituted among men and derive their just powers from the consent of those being governed. This is actually a Biblical concept. The Lord created men to judge by His Own standards, and His first [not last] line of defense against any form of evil was intended to be demonstrated through that government created by and consisting of men.

If a man fails to appropriate that role, he fails in that role. If he fails in that role, his family, his congregation and his culture will suffer as a consequence.

And the effects are cumulative.

So the true savior will always fight because he loves his God, not necessarily because of his love for anything else. He will confront evil from every dimension available to launch the attack—physically, intellectually and spiritually.

But even he can be caught off guard. The Great Deceiver preys upon his weaknesses. In his pursuit to build and preserve his domain of righteousness, the savior can easily lose sight of his Achilles heel. That’s why the man who claims to belong to Jesus Christ cannot afford to fight alone.

The good news is that the call to defend the innocent and vulnerable has always resonated with men. Just as young boys are constantly looking for real masculine behavior to imitate, so also are clear thinking men drawn to the call of battle.

Wholesome, prosperous people are the champions of courage and sacrifice—especially of men. But, unfortunately, most men allow themselves to be defeated spiritually before they succumb physically.

O’ man of God, He’s calling you to live and act in the likeness of His Son, the Christ, for the sake of posterity.

Will you teach them how?

Refining the Willing Man

Jesus said “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.” [Matt. 5:9]  

So how do I square this sentence with passages that appear to contradict it?  For example:

“Do you suppose that I came to grant peace on earth?  I tell you, no, but rather division.  For from now on five members in one household will be divided, three against two and two against three.  They will be divided, father against son, and son against father, mother against daughter, and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter in-law, and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law.”  [Lk. 12:51-53]

Perhaps the previous sentence spoken to His disciples provides a clue to the reader about the refining nature of division:

“I came to pour fire upon the Earth, and how I wish it were already set on fire!  And I have a baptism to undergo, and how distressed I am until it is accomplished!”  [Lk. 12:49-50]

It’s very possible some of His disciples had no idea what He was talking about here.  But, a 21st Century inductive Bible student understands His words “fire upon the Earth” not as a direct reference to His second coming, but rather, completely in the context of human spiritual purification.

If he doesn’t, then he might unwittingly diminish the impact of what Jesus said.

Fire isn’t just an agent of extermination.  It’s also critical to the refining process of metals, something most ancient Palestinians were familiar with.  Placing raw metal ore into a fire was the only way to separate the pure metal from the impurities which contaminated it. In the same manner also, through the man, Jesus Christ, the Spirit Himself proliferates the fire by which the Lord’s people are purified [or refined] even to this day.

So…it appears that He really did mean exactly what He said.

The refining process isn’t always a pleasant thing, but it’s always a good thing. Just like a piece of iron ore, it breaks me down and separates me from my impurities. And I’d like to think it brings people together in faith more often than it separates them.

Because Jesus taught His disciples that “peace,” in its authentic sense, is realized only through a committed lifestyle conducive to God’s vision of purity in conduct.  If I attempt to make peace without a clear understanding of what that actually means, I’m probably just fanning the flames of pride and ignorance.

If I’m really a Biblical peacemaker, I’ll welcome the refining process.

A Crucial PART of the ‘CIPLE

No language brings across the nature of continuity better than the Biblical Greek Present Active Participle.

There are countless examples of this in the Greek New Testament. A verb recorded in the Present Active Tense alone suggests some degree of progressive action, but the participle drives the nail down flush.

Unfortunately, most English translations don’t always reflect the continuous verbal aspect the Biblical authors intended by using participles, often leaving the reader no option but to speculate about the full meaning.

For example, the NASB Translation reads:

“He who has My commandments and keeps them is the one who loves Me; and he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him and will disclose Myself to him.” [Jn. 14:21]  [emphasis mine]

Literally translated in light of verbal aspect, this passage reads:

“The one having My commandments and is keeping them—that one is the one continuously loving Me. And the one loving Me shall be loved by My Father, and I shall love him and shall reveal Myself to him.”   [emphasis mine]

Am I splitting hairs? Maybe a little.

But the author—the disciple Jesus loved—was trying to illustrate how genuine love is demonstrated by an unbroken flow of willful obedience, driven by a spirit of gratefulness. He leaves no room to suggest that the action of “loving” could have been a one-time event.

The good news is I don’t have to spend years learning Koine Greek grammar and vocabulary to spot participles. Bible software is available which can allow the reader to instantly determine the true aspect of any verb.

But there’s more.

I can’t think of anyone I’d prefer to reveal Himself to me more than the One who saved me from myself.

“I am the vine, you are the branches; he who continues to remain in Me and I in him, he bears much fruit, for apart from Me you can do nothing.” [Jn. 15:5]

Don’t Look for the Wings

What does the Bible actually tell us about angels?

If I read closely, I might be scratching my head. Because tradition has historically depicted these created beings with graphics and narratives that don’t always jibe with the texts.

Probably the most popular but bizarre portrayal of angels today is illustrated in images having feminine physical features and characteristics. There are any number of reasons for this. But, in the original languages, the term “angel” is always recorded as a Masculine noun, confirming the dominion the Lord has designated to masculine authority.

[Greek: ἄγγελος, (ân-gê-lôs) angel, messenger, one who is sent] [Hebrew: מַלְאָךְ (mâ-lâk) a messenger]

I’d also do well to remember that, when cornered by the Sadducees, Jesus reminded them that, for those worthy of “attaining ” to the coming age by being raised from the dead, marriage would no longer be a thing because they’d also be “like the angels.”

So, the reader can safely assume that sexual distinction probably won’t exist either. [Lk. 20:34-36]

Perhaps the Letter to the Hebrews reveals the most about the character and authority of messengers. The very first sentence explains that the Lord God spoke to “the fathers” at many times and in many ways. As the author continues to convince the reader that our current High Priest, Jesus Christ, provides us a much better intermediary to the Father, I can begin to understand how critical a role God’s messengers had originally played in conveying His plan for salvation to the world.

But they’re also spiritual guardians in His agency.

They’re warriors. The ones who didn’t follow the Great Deceiver are critical to the scope of our Lord’s Master Plan. They inform. [Gen. 18:1-5] They protect. [Dan. 12:1] They prophesy [Dan. 12:2-13] They fight. [Dan. 10:13] And the saints of Christ’s ἐκκλησία shall judge them. [1Cor. 6:3]

Most of all, they’re still around. And they have a mission, They’re “ministering spirits, sent out to render service for the sake of those who are about to inherit salvation.” [Heb. 1:13-14]

Will you inherit?

Those Eager Bereans

How do we know what to believe?

Never used to be a problem for me. I’d simply ask the pastor what we all believed after I joined. Then I wondered why the enthusiasm didn’t last very long.

On the other hand, I normally had plenty of confidence navigating my occupation, having the necessary knowledge in that realm I could base information on. And I loved acquiring that knowledge.

So, is there any way for Jesus Christ’s disciple to validate what he hears?

I could confirm much of what’s said about the Bible by simply corroborating parts of the Old Testament with the New Testament—especially what the apostle Paul wrote because, believe it or not, not everyone just took him at his word:

“The brethren immediately sent Paul and Silas away by night to Berea, and when they arrived, they went into the synagogue of the Jews. Now these were more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they received the word with great eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so.” [Ac. 17:11] [my emphasis]

[προθυμία, (prǒ-thū-mee’-â) willingness, readiness, eagerness, zeal]

Of course, at that time, Paul didn’t have quite the reputation he has now. Even so, the reliability of God’s written word is substantiated in the text of this passage—along with evidence of the audacity some people are willing to demonstrate just to be sure about what others tell them.

So, is it really that simple? Is truth available to me if I’m just willing to read the Bible inductively?

I’m convinced it is. Not unlike a job, a big part of discipleship is about attaining enough knowledge to be able to discern between truth and lies.

The Bereans knew what the Scriptures said because they loved them.

And they were determined to know the truth.

Flipping the Ghoulish Narrative

Something inside of me always suspected that gruesome, morbid festivities were inherently inappropriate.

But somehow, celebrating a day known as “Halloween” got a pass. I could dress myself and my kids up like zombies—all for a few laughs and some free candy. Then, later, when that tiny sense of errancy began to raise its ugly head , I’d raise my bar accordingly, allowing only costumes which were “cute” or “innocent.”

Gotta love that word.

Innocence is the absence of blame. It defines a condition vindicated from guilt. It can also be considered a virtue. But it was never intended to be an excuse for vacuous behavior.

For years, I attempted to justify using my child’s true innocence to protect my ignorance—and eventually, my obstinance about participating in Halloween activities. I was okay with enrolling my sacred trust from the Lord into what is the greatest folly of the darkness of this world.

But I never considered the consequences.

The world loves Halloween. But if I’m truly a disciple of Jesus Christ, I’ll allow the Spirit to guide me, because I can’t get a little bit pregnant: 

“Come out of her, My people, so that you will not participate in her [Babylon] sins and receive of her plagues…”  [Rev. 18:4a]

Moms, dads, grandpas and grandmas, Halloween is your opportunity to shine:  

“Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them, for it is disgraceful even to speak of the things which are done by them in secret.”    [Eph. 5:11-12]

Be bold.  Remember Jesus.  Remember Charlie. 

Dying to Live Again

If there’s anything I need to be encouraged about from other men on a regular basis, it’s reckoning myself dead to sin.

But teaching that sin is a stumbling block toward the goal of inheriting the very best God has to offer isn’t considered to be a good tool for building congregational membership.

However, membership isn’t always a Biblical construct.

On the other hand, developing the courage and skill to challenge the popular norms of young college students in a forum of open public debate is. If Charlie Kirk were still around, he could confirm that truth is a mechanism often inflicting the necessary shame needed to bring about reform.

And he wasn’t alone.

Jesus Christ’s other faithful followers are busy teaching the tenets of discipleship to men who are hungry for solid food. They’ve somehow discovered that the Bible is packed with insight and encouragement for all those who have ears to hear!

In his letter to all who [were] beloved of God in Rome, called as saints, the apostle Paul wrote:

“Therefore we have been buried with Him through baptism into death, so that, as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life. For if we have become united (with Him) in the likeness of His death, certainly we shall also be (in the likeness) of His resurrection, knowing this, that our old self was crucified (with Him), in order that our body of sin might be rendered ineffective, so that we would no longer be slaves to sin, for he who has died is freed from sin. Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with Him.” [Rom. 6:4-8] [my emphasis]

Imagine that.

Paul regarded baptism as more of a commitment rather than a symbolic gesture.

I shouldn’t be so naive to think that, just because I’ve been rescued from the slave market of sin, I’m not capable of wandering back into it. I need to be encouraged and motivated away from presenting any members of my body as instruments for unrighteous conduct. [Rom. 6:12-13]

This topic would seem to be essential to understanding what Jesus Christ and the Biblical authors actually taught, but then, highly unlikely to pack the pews on Sunday mornings, because the cup of conviction swallows a lot harder than grape juice.

Another reason to thank God for the Charlie Kirks of this world.

So would it be reasonable to assume that the subject of dying to sin would warrant weekly discussion, study and application techniques among our relevant peers?

Absolutely.

Because this is Biblical meat and potatoes, and only a few are weaned.

The Work of Husbandry

If I ask what a husband is today, the definitions could vary considerably, depending, of course, upon what kind a day a wife is having…

This English word is derived from a combination of the Scandinavian words “hús” and “bóndi.” Húsbóndi meant “house occupier.” I actually have a college degree in Animal Husbandry but, for over fifty years, I never felt so inclined to investigate the morphology of this term. That happened only after I learned that the true Biblical meaning of the word “husband” was much more encompassing than a dictionary or a certificate of learning could ever suggest.

In fact, being a husbandman is one of the primary characteristics of a godly man.

But how does he do that?

Perhaps by first understanding what husbandry actually is. Efficiency is the key. A husbandman builds upon what he has and makes it better. He takes his extensive knowledge of something and combines it with a passion to make it thrive and prosper for him and those who depend on him.

Jesus’ parable about being productive with resources [or talents] provides a comprehensive model of effective husbandry. [Matt. 25:14-40] A successful husbandman seeks to understand his domain well and strives to learn how to connect, cultivate and invest in it wisely. But it isn’t limited to his relationship with his wife.

It might also include a cornfield or a mission field. Or maybe a herd of cattle or a flock of the Lord’s sheep.

But, whatever it is that he does, he does it for his Master since he understands that, while redemption is wholly unearned, the reward of an inheritance in the coming kingdom is based on works. [Col. 3:23-24]. The true husbandman is focused more on the welfare and fertility of his domain than he is on personal status.

The Lord’s mandate for man to work was both defined and demonstrated consistently in form and function. [see: Gen. 2:5-15] His realm of responsible husbandry extends well beyond that of his occupation, wife and family to include everything in his domain.

He acquires. He sows. He cultivates. He guards. Then he reaps.

Will You Live in the Age?

There’s nothing like hearing it from the horse’s mouth.

For example, when it came to raising the dead, Jesus was very straightforward explaining exactly what He intended to do and when:

” …I have come down from the heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. This is the will of Him who sent Me, that, of every [thing] that He has given Me, I lose nothing of it, but raise it up on the last day. For this [also] is the will of My Father, that everyone who is observing the Son and believing in Him shall possess eternal life, and I Myself shall raise him up on the last day.” [Jn. 6:38-40; see also: Jn. 6:44]

So then, what would be the reason for “raising” someone if part of him wasn’t actually dead?

And what is the actual significance of being raised up on the last day?

Plenty. According to the apostolic authors, this event coincides with Jesus Christ’s return to the earth when He not only raises the righteous dead [see: Ac. 24:15; Lk. 14:14], but also inaugurates the Lord’s Millennial Kingdom. [see: 1Thes. 4:13; 1Cor. 15; Rev. 19,20]

The goal of the Christian life is to live in the age.

However, most Bible translations today use the word “forever” where the Greek idiom, εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα, is found in the text. Literally, this phrase means, “in [or into] the age.” Unfortunately, these translations often turn the meaning around to fit the traditional bias’ of the translators. But Jesus never needed to explain what it meant.

Because everyone understood that in order to “live in the [coming] age,” they’d first need to be raised back to life:

“I am the living bread that came down out of the heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he shall live in the age…” [Jn. 6:51]

“He who is eating My flesh and drinking My blood possesses eternal life , and I shall raise him up on the last day.” [Jn. 6:54

“As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who is eating Me, he also shall live because of Me. This is the bread which came down out of heaven; not as the [manna the] fathers ate and died. He who is eating this bread shall live in the age.” [Jn. 6:57-58]

These words Jesus spoke are conditional in context.

Eat well, Brothers.

The Test Worth Taking

I’d like to think I could never separate myself from the Lord.

And the apostle Paul reminds us that nothing can ever separate us from His love. [see: Rom. 8:38-39] But even if I unwittingly choose to “…grieve the Spirit,” I’m pushing the envelope. [see: Eph. 4:30]

I am, after all, a man originally created with an inherent nature to sin. [see: Rom. 7:14-25]

The problem is, that dog still hunts in every man still drawing breath in this age. But it seems that every second I allow the Spirit to lead me, it’s impossible for me to grieve Him. [see: Rom. 8:5-10]

King David developed a similar pragmatic attitude about his faith and obedience to the Lord. While he was certainly a man after God’s own heart, he never pulled any punches about his imperfect nature. Nor did he ever persist trying to make excuses for his abhorrent behavior.

During the short time he tried to dance around his illegitimate affair with his best friend’s wife, he was slamming the door in the face of the Holy Spirit—over and over again. Remember also that he was about as “saved” as a man could be at that time.

The Lord had set him apart by anointing him King of His people.

Yet in spite of his conduct, he revered God. The Scriptures record no evidence that he sought any resentment or vengeance for the Lord’s judgement upon him. Instead, David demonstrated the epitome of repentance and contrition:

Restore to me the joy of Your salvation and sustain me with a willing spirit.” [Psa. 51:12] [my emphasis]

But then, could he have known instinctively that “sustaining” salvation required a prophylactic approach?

“Search me, O God, and know my heart. Test me and know my anxious thoughts, and see if there be any hurtful way in me, and lead me in the everlasting way. “ [Psa. 139:23-24] [my emphasis]

The Lord keeps His faithful train on the track.